Superstitions, Spaceships and Covid-19
This week I listened to prominent voices praising the success of the SpaceX rocket ship and the work of the scientist involved there, while at the same time publicly rejecting the guidance of other scientist on how to best prevent the spread of the Covid-19 coronavirus. This got me thinking about what people understand or don’t understand about science and the scientific method.
![]() |
| Scientific Method |
Most of us that drive cars, fly in airplanes, ride elevators or take medicine are showing a high level of trust in science already. In fact, we trust our very lives to it daily. Superstitions, on the other hand, arise from either a misunderstanding of science, or a greater degree of belief in magic. Magic is defined as the use of means such as charms or spells believed to have supernatural power over natural forces. Not many of us, no matter our religious affiliations or political preferences, want to fly into space or ride an elevator to the top floor dependent on charms and spells to get us up and back safely. I think most of us would appreciate the use of the scientific method to ensure our safety.
• One televangelist in the USA urges his followers to touch their televisions as a means of vaccination by proxy to prevent the Covid-19 infections.• A politician in India encourages the practice of yoga to prevent Covid-19.• Others encourage the drinking of cow urine.• In the middle east drinking camel urine and visiting pilgrimage sites are said to heal people or prevent them from getting infected by Covid-19.• Some have claimed, without evidence, that vegetarians are immune from Covid-19.
*Scientific Method – A process of checking conclusions against nature. After observing something, a scientist tries to explain what has been seen.The explanation is called a hypothesis. There is always at least one alternative hypothesis.A part of nature is tested in a “controlled experiment” to see if the explanation matches reality. A controlled experiment is one in which all treatments are identical except that some are exposed to the hypothetical cause and some are not. Any differences in the way the treatments behave is attributed to the presence and lack of the cause.If the results of the experiment are consistent with the hypothesis, there is evidence to support the hypothesis. If the two do not match, the scientist seeks an alternative explanation and redesigns the experiment.When enough evidence accumulates, the understanding of this natural phenomenon is considered a scientific theory. A scientific theory persists until additional evidence causes it to be revised.
************************************************************************
Discover more from The Future - With Kevin Benedict
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


